This post explores why even well-intentioned platform engineering initiatives tend to result in teams becoming larger than expected over time. It examines the drivers behind this growth trap and provides strategies for rightsizing based on organizational needs.
As more companies recognize the strategic importance of platform engineering, many are jumping in with the allure of starting small — the classic "two-pizza team" mindset. However, all too often these initiatives fall into the "platform trap" — where teams continuously grow way beyond initial projections. At Giant Swarm, we've seen this play out time and again.
So what's behind this phenomenon? A few key culprits:
- Scope creep: As platforms prove their value, there's pressure to take on more use cases and responsibilities. The team grows to absorb the extra workload.
- Technical debt: Shortcuts taken to launch quickly come back to bite later as reliability or scalability issues. More engineers are needed to untangle the mess.
- Innovation demands: Developers always want the latest and greatest capabilities. Platform teams bloat to keep up with the relentless feature requests, even though platform engineering should focus on delivering core capabilities rather than chasing every new tool.
- Attrition: As overextended platform engineers burn out, organizations backfill to maintain baseline service levels. A vicious cycle ensues.
While the intentions are good, the reality of building platforms usually involves far more complexity than expected and unchecked platform growth brings significant challenges. Bloated teams are expensive to maintain, slower to innovate, and more difficult to manage. Silos emerge, and ownership gets muddled.
The key is to be proactive about rightsizing — ensuring your platform organization matches your true needs. This requires ongoing discipline, but a few strategies can help:
Speaking of partnering, all companies eventually look to hire another engineer to run their cloud native stack. But the costs add up quickly — a $120k salary plus 25% overhead, 25% for onboarding, education, churn, etc. You could easily spend $180k+ per year and that’s just for one hire. For the same price, you could have Giant Swarm fully manage your environment and discover the added value of treating Kubernetes as a fully managed product.
At Giant Swarm, our core focus is helping companies avoid the platform trap. Our Smarter Platform Engineering approach extends your team with automation and expertise designed to maximize impact while minimizing bloat. You get battle-tested components out-of-the-box, letting you focus precious in-house resources where they matter most.
The benefits? An enterprise-solid and secure open source platform. Instant expert response (<5 min) and live issue resolution for short MTTR. A diverse skill set for better decisions, with dedicated teams for security, observability, connectivity and more. You essentially get maintainers and contributors better than you could hire yourself.
The allure of the platform engineering journey is real and warranted. But like most expeditions, careful planning is required to reach your destination without getting lost along the way. By understanding common pitfalls and employing disciplined strategies, you can keep your teams lean and pave the way to DevOps success. In the end, that's really what it's all about. To help you plan better for the next year, here are our cloud-native predictions for 2025.
